Archive for November, 2005

November 2005 Acquisitions

New acquisitions this month include:

a creepy and compelling new novella from Laird Barron, which is–and I know this is going to come as a huge shock–horrific and really strange; a clever alternate history from Gardner Dozois; some good old-fashioned space-faring SF from Robert Onopa; a new Guth Bandar tale from Matthew Hughes; and a hilarious short-short from Tim McDaniel, which is…well, it’s just wrong on so many levels (but in a good way).

Read More

SCI FICTION Tribute Blog

Dave Schwartz has set up a blog called the ED SF Project, in which he invites people to drop by and write an appreciation of one of the many stories SCI FICTION has published over the years. It’s first come, first serve, so get over there post-haste to claim your favorite SCI FICTION story and write up a nice tribute.

In Dave’s words:

By my count there are 320+ stories archived at the site. I’m willing to bet that there are that many SF writers/critics/fans/what have you who have some sort of presence on the web. So I’m thinking, let’s all of us write an appreciation of one of the stories.

It doesn’t need to be something long — it could be a few paragraphs, or it could be in-depth; it could be a critical analysis or just a reaction to the story. Just something that focuses on the fiction and shows how much impact the site has had. Remember, this is an appreciation. A celebration. Pick a story you love, or discover a new one by reading through the archives. Discover for yourself just what we’re losing. Then let’s give it the best sendoff possible.

http://edsfproject.blogspot.com/

Read More

Another dose of corporate-think

One of my favorite reactions thus far to the death of SCI FICTION, by Matt Hughes (via the Asimov’s forum):

Another dose of fucking corporate-think. Making a world full of people who know the price of everything and the value of nothing.

One of these days we’re going to have to realize that an economy is a necessary part of a civilization, but not a workable substitute for one.

Read More