Lunacon (Part One)

I went to Lunacon for the first time this weekend. It was held at the Sheraton Meadowlands hotel, which means it was in Jersey, and I could just commute back and forth without having to spring for a pricey hotel room…though that did prove to be more of a hassle than I’d expected. Not fun driving home in the wee hours of the morning only to drive back after a few hours of sleep.

In addition to being the first day of Lunacon, Friday was also the date of a regular group lunch that Gordon and I attend monthly in Manhattan. My bud David Barr Kirtley was attending that for the first time, so he and I made plans to drive over to Lunacon together later in the day. But since he’d never ventured into Hoboken via the PATH train before, he went back to Hoboken with us right after lunch, and having nothing planned for the next couple hours until I got off work, he came back to the illustrious offices of F&SF and sat and wandered around those hallowed halls, eyes wide in abject wonder.

At lunch, the subject of men’s adventure novels came up. You know the sort, the ones like Don Pendelton and James Axler… titles like THE DEATHLANDS and THE EXECUTIONER. All series stuff, often post-apocalyptic, peopled entirely with gun-toting, amoral survivalists. Anyway, Gordon mentioned one of the problems with those books is that the protagonist always, at some point in the narrative, stops to admire his (for they are always male) six-foot-two frame in a mirror… a cheap narrative trick to describe the protagonist. Gordon complained that people don’t do that in real life. Dave disagreed, claiming that he was six-foot-two and he often stopped to admire his frame in mirrors. And he does too; I’ve seen him do it. In fact, we were late to several panels because he had to take some extra time to admire himself.

So anyway, Dave and I headed out to the con sometime after five, and we got off route 3 one exit too soon, so we ended up driving around in circles over by Giants Stadium. It’s all Dave’s fault; he was the navigator and he led us astray.

We get to the hotel sometime before six I think, then stand in lines to register for the con and check into the hotel. After waiting in the registration line for about 45 minutes, I realize I definitely should have pre-registered.

After getting that taken care of, we head off to dinner at the only restaurant, and run into Elizabeth Glover (who I know from the OWW), and her friend Rachel. We joined them, but they had to run off to get ready for a panel called “Wrong About Japan,” which was a discussion about all the ways in which Americans have come to have wrong ideas about Japan because of the way it’s depicted in anime and manga. That sounded like something I would like to hear, seeing as how I’ve been on this big Kurosawa kick lately (the man is brilliant), and had, in fact, just watched THRONE OF BLOOD the night before.

I did in fact get to see half the panel, but only half because the first half of it overlapped with Dave’s reading…which no one really showed up for. There was me, Christopher Cevasco (editor/publisher of PARADOX), and a writer Dave knew from the Odyssey workshop, Andrea Kail (who works at the CONAN O’BRIEN SHOW). There were also a couple of people just chatting in the room who deigned to silence themselves and listen when Dave started reading. So, could have been worse. It was a crappy timeslot — there was no time for Dave to talk to anyone at the con and to mention that he had a reading. He did a good job with his performance of “The Black Bird,” which I think is one of his best stories, and well worth hunting down if you haven’t read it (it’s in NEW VOICES IN SCIENCE FICTION, edited by Mike Resnick), though he ended up choosing that one really because by the time he got around to starting the reading he only had fifteen minutes left (and that one is quite short).

Next up was the Meet the Pros event in the lobby, where Dave and I wandered around for a while, but I don’t think we actually did meet any pros. But that was just for a half hour, because at 9:30 was the art show, which required special invitations for some reason — I think only panelists were allowed to attend or something — but Dave was a panelist so he was able to get me in, not that anyone was collecting invitations at the door. We caught up with Andrea and Chris in there and wandered around and admired all the art, much of which featured naked, muscular pixie women, though there was a pretty cool Noah’s Ark sculpture thing that Andrea and I were strangely obsessed with for a while. I was going to buy it, but it cost ten thousand dollars, so instead I charged it to my F&SF expense account (won’t Gordon be surprised!).

(TO BE CONTINUED…)

Read More

2004 The Gaylactic Spectrum Awards

The Gaylactic Spectrum Awards are given to recognize outstanding works in science fiction, fantasy, or horror, which deal positively with issues, themes, and characters of special relevance to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered communities. Winners are chosen by a panel of judges. Nominations are open to everyone. Readers, fans, writers/creators, publishers, and more are encouraged to nominate their own or others’ works. The Closing Date for Nominations/Recommendations will be March 31.

http://www.spectrumawards.org/nomform.htm

Go nominate! You can do so as many times as you like.

F&SF picks:

Serostatus by John Peyton Cooke (F&SF, Jan. 2004)
Pervert by Charles Coleman Finlay (F&SF, Mar. 2004)
Kissing Frogs by Jaye Lawrence (F&SF, May 2004)

Read More

Thoughts on Hugo Categories

If Worldcon is going to continue to add the “Best Website” award once and a while, they really need to clarify the categories. See, to me, an e-zine like the Fortean Bureau should be (and is) eligible for Fanzine every year. The miscellaneous “best website” award should be reserved for resources or sites that are SFnal, but otherwise *not* zines of some kind (be it pro, semi-pro, or fan).

See, to vote for a website like SF Weekly or SCI FICTION is kind of like making them eligible in two different categories, because Scott Edelman and Ellen Datlow are both eligible for the Best Editor Hugo, which is what you should nominate them for if think they deserve a rocket. But best website should be for something like Locus Online (which is zine-like, but more of a resource), the ISFDB, or… I don’t know. I think that category on the whole needs redefining, as do some of the others.

But speaking of fanzines, I think it’s high time that we really start filling that category with nominees that are readily available. Do that many people really read all those little non-fiction zines that end up on the ballot each year? What about all those small press fiction zines, like Christopher Rowe’s Say… or Flytrap, or Lady Churchill’s Rosebud Wristlet? Those are all fanzines, are they not? Why aren’t *those* being nominated? Or your favorite e-zine, like aforementioned Fortean Bureau, or Ideomancer, etc.?

Another category I think needs redefining is the Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form. Okay, I realize this was added so that TV shows would have a shot against all the movies each year. The problem is, there’s usually not five award-worthy movies released each year, and I don’t think there are five good SFnal TV series on the air right now (and the only one that I can think of off the top of my head that would deserve an award, Carnivale, didn’t air any episodes in 2004). I think the answer to this admittedly minor dilemma would be to make one of the dramatic presentation categories for movies, and make the other one for miscellaneous dramatic presentations, allowing for television episodes, radio dramas, and audiobooks to be nominated. Currently, radio dramas and audiobooks are technically eligible for the Dramatic Presentation Long Form category, but most people don’t realize this, and just automatically nominate movies. I would prefer that there actually be a category solely for audiobooks, but I’ve been told that if I actually lobby for a new award to be added to the ballot, I may be killed, because goddamn it, isn’t the award ceremony long enough as it is?

Read More

Oscar-nominated Short Films

Salon.com has made this year’s Oscar-nominated short films available to view on their website. Hurry, go watch now, because you’ve only got until midnight tonight to watch them. If you don’t subscribe to Salon, just watch one of their ads so you can get the day pass, which will give you full access for the day.

I’ve watched two of them so far (“Guard Dog” and “Ryan”), and both are great, definitely worth watching. Go check them out:

http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2005/02/25/shorts/index.html

Read More

Jonesin’ for Eucalyptus

Over a noisy lunch the other day, I overheard Ellen Datlow talking about her experiences in Australia and New Zealand while she was teaching Clarion South. I only caught bits and pieces of the conversation, but I heard someone say “I heard they’re mean,” to which Gordon replied “That’s because they’re all hopped up on eucalyptus.” Naturally, I assumed he was referring to the Clarion students, and I found myself looking forward to seeing the prose churned out by the eucalyptus-fueled rage of the Aussies.

Turns out they were talking about koalas. Needless to say, I was greatly disappointed.

Read More

Mad Cow Films

In his book COLLAPSE, author Jared Diamond says that in order to effect a change in a large company, one has to determine “which links in the supply chain are sensitive to public pressure.” For instance, when mad cow disease was a potential threat here in the states, the FDA issued some edicts to the meat industry, but the meat industry was slow to enact any changes. However, once McDonalds noticed a distinct decrease in customers and determined that the lack of business was due at least in part to fears over eating meat that could possibly have been infected with mad cow disease, they went to the meat industry and complained…which produced near instant results.

This got me thinking about the current state of science fiction in television and movies. The reason all these crappy SF movies keep getting made is because people keep going to the theater to see them. We allow the lure of special effects and pretty movie making lure us to the theater to see movies that usually don’t turn out to be any good, yet no matter what is said about the movie critically, our money is still going into the production company’s pockets; if enough of our money gets into their pockets, they translate that as a successful movie. So you end up with a director like Paul W. S. Anderson (or a screenwriter like Jeff Vintar, post-I, Robot), becoming, in the eyes of the production companies, authorities on science fiction, when in fact–to quote From Dusk til Dawn–they “don’t know rat shit from Rice Krispies.”

Unfortunately, the way Hollywood works, the failure of any SFnal movie would be bad for all SF movies; while it would be nice to see the genre not be further disparaged by the likes of films (and I use the term loosely) such as Battlefield Earth, the failure of any SF movie would only make it more difficult to get *any* SF movie made, even one with a brilliant script.

Read More

New Goal for 2005

I say witty things on occasion. Sometimes I even write them down, or post them to this blog, or to a newsgroup or a message board. Thus it is my goal this year to say something clever enough for Dave Langford to quote me in Ansible; failing that, I hope to say something stupid enough, or Thog-like enough, that he will be compelled to mock me.

Read More

February Acquisitions

This month, we bought new stories from: Paolo Bacigalupi, Terry Bisson, Scott Bradfield, Robert Reed, Carter Scholz, Sydney Joyce Van Scyoc, Bruce Sterling, and Steven Utley. We also bought a story from Michaela Roessner, which we believe makes her and her grandfather Elmer the first grandparent/grandchild duo to publish stories in F&SF.

And lest I forget — yet another new slush survivor, by the name of Ef Deal.

Read More